Model Integrity Review (MIR) provides independent, management-led, document-based review of analytical models and their supporting documentation, focused on structural clarity, internal consistency, assumption traceability, and documentation sufficiency for management oversight, audit, or decision use.
MIR exists to answer a narrow but critical question:
Can leadership clearly understand, explain, and stand behind this model as it is currently documented?
The review focuses on explainability under reasonable questioning, not on technical correctness, analytical performance, validation, or endorsement.
This question becomes critical when models are briefed beyond their authors — to executives, reviewers, auditors, or external stakeholders.
MIR complements existing validation or governance programs by focusing on clarity and defensibility of the model as documented. We do not perform statistical testing, performance benchmarking, or regulatory compliance work.
MIR does not build, modify, run, or validate models. We review existing materials and provide a short written review memorandum describing scope, observed strengths, and documentation or structural risks. The memorandum is advisory and is not an endorsement, certification, or validation.